Possible
What could reasonably be done?
Built from current capabilities, business tasks, firm context, and practical constraints.
Methodology
AIBI first maps what today’s AI can reasonably do, then reviews credible evidence of what industries report using. Keeping those questions separate prevents adoption data from changing the assessment of what is technically and practically possible.
Possible
Built from current capabilities, business tasks, firm context, and practical constraints.
Actual
Built from external adoption evidence, normalization, evidence grades, and uncertainty.
AI in practice
Capability horizon · 2026.10
Effective .
Stable capability identities receive dated assessments of maturity, affordability, reliability, integration difficulty, oversight, and risk.
Capabilities are mapped to concrete work rather than broad claims about replacing jobs or industries.
Transparent weights and safety caps convert capability-task mappings into a reproducible task score.
Task scores roll into business functions and then a representative industry archetype.
Government surveys, credible studies, and other observations are normalized without entering the Possible calculation.
A gap is calculated only when Possible and Actual measure compatible populations, periods, constructs, and scales.
Grades and confidence communicate directness, source quality, uncertainty, and limitations without false precision.
Capabilities, evidence, methods, and scores are timestamped so the index can change transparently as AI changes.
Non-negotiable rules
Illustrative snapshot